Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Yeaton's avatar

Resection of duodenal lesions is recognized to be one of the highest risk endoscopic interventions that can be made.

I always consider the relationship to the major and minor papillae and the orientation to the greater sac and other extraluminal structures.

Then I assess the polyp itself and consider my choice of scope; a duodenoscope may improve visualization, and the elevator offers additional control over devices deployed.

Then I consider the potential benefit of water immersion vs CO2 insufflation.

Use of a lifting agent has benefits but in some instances water immersion is sufficient to complete a resection without lifting.

Growths such as that defined below are subject to peristaltic traction and become pedunculated; as with the colon, consideration for mitigating bleeding may include the use of epinephrine, loops, or clips as the stalk harbors an artery.

Generous use of an agent to mitigate motility is always required to help retain the resected lesion. Introduction of electrocautery may stimulate contractile activity.

Anticipate how the resected lesion will be removed and always be mindful of how the airway will be protected when the lesion is withdrawn through the pharynx.

No posts

Ready for more?